General

← Customer Feedback for Nature Index

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Do not include all articles in Eur. Journal Phys. C

    I would like to suggest a restriction on papers published in European Physical Journal C to letters and large collaboration experiments. The level and importance of the Journal is at most equivalent to the Physical Review D whose regular articles are not included in the count. The criteria for acceptance in Eur. J. Phys. C is

    "describe original work or provide details of original work previously published in a Letter article. There is no general limitation of the overall size nor of the number of figures, nor of the level of details considered to be necessary"

    While Phys. Review D

    …

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  2. Allow users to see the articles making up top collaborations

    On the collaboration page for each institution, it would be nice to be able to click on each "top collaborator" and see the list of articles the institutions collaborated on. This helps to answer questions when management sees an expected collaborator listed in one of the top 10 lists.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  3. Dis-aggregate the IISERs in your Institution outputs ranking for India

    Messrs

    Inidan Institute of Science Education and Research is not one institution but (at the moment ) 7 : soon to rise to 9. To quote Wikipedia

    "Seven IISERs have been established across the country, namely IISER Kolkata in West Bengal, IISER Pune in Maharashtra, IISER Mohali in Punjab, IISER Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh, IISER Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala, IISER Tirupati in Andhra Pradesh and IISER Berhampur in Odisha.[4] [5] Two new IISERs, at Berhampur, Odisha and Nagaland were announced in the 2015 Budget.[6][7] "

    ranking ``IISER'' at AC=143 above IISc(Bangalore) AC=131 or IIT Mumbai(AC=78) is absurd because you have clubbed…

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  4. Journal suggestions

    Please suggest any journals you would like to be included in the Nature Index. Please list them in order of your preference.

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

  5. emphasis on first author

    Since most of the work is done by the first author(s) there should be a higher weigth be set in the counting for the respective institute, eg. first author's institute receives 50% credit, the rest is distributed like in the FC. In this way also the problem with the last author would be accounted for, since in most cases the first and last author have the same affiliation

    20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Forgot password?
    Create a password
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

General

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)